Clueless Negotiating

I recently saw a press release about a “new eBay-style platform which allows vendors to bypass agents” being launched by non-bank lender inTouch. The release said that the service was designed to deliver transparency and allow vendors to avoid paying agents’ fees.

Sounds fair enough: I don’t mind competition, and I especially respect good competition.

The founder of inTouch, Mr Paul Ryan, was quoted as saying that one of the great frustrations for vendors and buyers was the lack of transparency around the sales process. Their solution was a “vendor assisted” platform they call “Live Offer“.

A later quote attributed to Mr Ryan said: “Live Offer allows the vendor to see offers from real buyers and buyers know what other buyers are offering“.

I mean no disrespect to Mr Ryan or his company inTouch, and I wish him well in his venture. My purpose in mentioning this new offering is to highlight one flaw from a negotiating perspective that, to me, is clueless negotiating, specifically, “…and buyers know what other buyers are offering.”

No negotiation expert will tell you that it is smart negotiating to allow one buyer to hear what another has offered. What one buyer offers is NOBODY’S BUSINESS, except the agent (if one is involved) and the owner of the property under offer.

Yes, buyers at auctions can hear what another buyer has offered, and what do they do? They offer a small amount above the other buyer’s offer. They do not offer the maximum price they are prepared to pay for the property; they offer just $5,000 or $1,000 (and sometimes as low as $100) more than the other buyer.

So just because this happens at auction, it does not mean that allowing one buyer to hear what another has offered is good negotiating.

I hark back to what the experts say, and this is ALL experts, not just a few of them. Experts say that if you want to get a high price for anything, start high and reduce until a buyer is found. They also say that offers should be given in confidence, without other parties being privy to them.

There is transparency and then there is privacy. If I give you an offer, I expect privacy. I expect you to pass it onto the seller, who considers it and then accepts or rejects it, or perhaps asks me for more money – a counter offer.

I do not expect you to blab to another interested buyer and play me off against them. Nor do I believe that displaying my offer to other buyers – as ‘transparent’ as it may be – is anything other than clueless negotiating for any seller who expects to get the HIGHEST PRICE (which is different from a HIGH PRICE) for their property.

It is totally clueless to allow one buyer to know what another will pay. Worse than that, it’s a breach of privacy.

What happens on eBay? Many buyers sit and wait until the dying moments of the auction and then put in a last-second bid that is slightly higher than the current highest displayed offer. Often they win. But does the seller? Does the seller get a high price, or does the seller get the highest price that buyer was prepared to pay?

There can be a massive difference between “high” and “highest”.

Every time I attend an auction and say to the successful bidder, “Congratulations, you must be happy. Tell me, would you have paid more?” On all but ONE occasion, I have received the answer, “Yes“. Most said they would have paid more.

If money is left ‘on the table’, that method of sale has let the seller down.

Clueless negotiating is to allow buyers see each other’s offers.

I’ll take privacy over transparency when I go to sell, thank you very much.

PS If you feel that this article may be of use to potential property sellers, please feel free to distribute it as you see fit.

Recent Articles

Habits of the Greats

Habits are a foundation of success. As you progress through your sales career, your results will improve as you replace bad habits with good habit...

The Changing Face of Adult Education

As an educator in the real estate sector, I have seen the face of adult education change radically. Agency leaders should change their view of trainin...

Keep The Team Busy

Idle hands, idle mind, so the saying goes. School children who are kept busy with sport and similar extra-curricular activities are less likely to...

Can Booming Markets Conceal Mediocrity?

The real estate agent's prayer goes like this: "God grant me another boom and I promise I won't stuff it up this time". Such is the prayer of...

Group Your Tasks

'Task Hopping' is a time management trap that causes huge productivity losses. Real estate profit consultant, Gary Pittard, says that multitasking...

Buying a Name

Some real estate agency owners believe you need a big name to survive in the marketplace but this is not necessarily so. In the 25 years that I ha...

Should Leaders Sell

Owning a real estate agency and being a selling principal can be profitable, but what point is money if you have little free time to enjoy it? Rea...

Useless Notes

As a presenter, I often see attendees furiously taking notes, which may be flattering, but often leaves me wondering what they do with those notes. I ...

Ask For A Review

There is an old marketing saying that says: "Don't tell people how good you are. Get happy clients to tell people how good you are". References fr...

Forwards or Backwards: there is no standing still

A question I often ask leaders is "Where are you taking your...

Point Of Difference

Smart real estate agency leaders seek multiple Points of Difference for their agencies. When a seller says to your salesperson, "Why should I list...

Personality Matters

Meet Brendan and Adam, chefs and proprietors of a new restaurant called 34bia in Redfern in Sydney. Before this venture, Brendan and Adam owned a s...

Want to reach your profit potential? Contact us now.

Pittard


Suite 71, Level 4
330 Wattle Street

Ultimo NSW 2007
Australia


Mailing Address
PO Box 2045
Strawberry Hills NSW 2012


: (02) 8217 8500
Fax: (02) 9281 4198
AUS Free call: 1800 663 600
NZ Free call: 0800 448 065
International: +61 2 8217 8500

: info@pittard.com.au

Contact Us