Expensive Day Off


Would you pay somebody $9,400 to ‘hold the fort’ while you had a day off? If this sounds like an expensive day off to you prepare to be shocked: there are many leaders who pay this kind of money to non-performing salespeople for little more than the luxury of having somebody in the office while the leader rests.

I recently spoke to one leader who was on the verge of closing his doors. He cut almost every expense he could; he even considered operating out of his home. This leader’s wife went to work every day. The leader worked hard every day. But one expense this leader refused to cut was the salary of a ‘salesperson’ that had not made a sale in over two months.

There comes a time when ‘nice guy’ turns into ‘soft touch’. This employee was taking advantage of his leader, who was too weak to terminate the services of a chronic non-performer. For a person to draw a salary yet steadfastly refuse to do the actions that lead to results is, in my book, fraud. If a person will not do the actions, and will not either begin doing the actions or resign, this should be a criminal offence – it is taking money under false pretences.

If this sounds like an extreme case to you, it is not. Although most leaders would not allow a salesperson to go two months without making a sale, many allow team members to turn mediocrity into a career path.

While they may not pay $9,400 for a day off, these leaders still pay huge amounts for the luxury of time away from the office. Any money paid to non-performing salespeople is totally wasted. And if you are paying people like this ask yourself, “Why am I doing this?” Is it because you are too weak to fire them, lack the skill to lead them, or because you ‘need’ them because not having them means you have to list and sell?

None of these are valid excuses for holding onto non-performers.

In the Real Estate Agency Management Program we show leaders how much profit they lose by not having their team size at optimum level – at least four of your expenses are around $50,000 per month. A team of five will be more than $100,000 more profitable per annum than a team of three at the same level of income.

The team size, however, does not refer to just the number of people on the team.

To get this extra profit, all team members must produce approximately the same income per month.

This means that your team must be consistent performers. It also means that as a leader you must become obsessed with building a winning team, not just a sales team of a specific size. All people on your team must perform.

Instead of working with people who show no signs of improvement, the leader who paid a non-performer $9,400 for no sales would have done better had he put that money into hiring advertisements.

Had he done twenty First Interviews with potential winners each month, he would have been able to part company with somebody who clearly will not do the necessary actions to succeed and give an opportunity to an enthusiastic recruit who would.

The trouble is, this leader had hardly done a First Interview all year. Without the hope of fresh people joining the team, he held onto a ‘no-hoper’. The result: the business was devastated.

So the next time you reach the end of the month and see that one or more of your people have not performed to your standard ask yourself, “If I keep this person, am I paying big bucks just to have a day off?

Be honest. Then act.

Recent Articles

Let's Look At The Real Problem

In some markets, real estate agents often say that they have plenty of listings, but need buyers. Real estate agency profit consultant, Gary Pitta...

The More You Learn

Show me an industry where you can earn six-figure incomes without knowing what you are doing. I'll bet that you cannot name one. Yet this is what many...

Is Door Knocking Still Effective?

In a real estate industry poll, over 65 percent of respondents said that door knocking is no longer an effective method for finding new listings. In...

Strict or Soft: the problem with extremes

Some leaders are too strict with their teams. Others are too soft. There are problems with being at either extreme. Soft leaders Soft leader...

Salaries: Expense or Return?

Many real estate agency principals suffer from 'salary phobia': they view salaries as an expense instead of an investment. Real estate agency prof...

A Little Word Salespeople Should Use More Often

Good salespeople are always on the lookout for new lines and for new ways to deliver their messages, but there is one word that many should consid...

Clueless Negotiating

"Transparency" is all the rage, but as a negotiation strategy it is full of holes. Real estate agency profit consultant, Gary Pittard, says that tra...

Why Do We Do It To Ourselves?

There would not be one business leader who doesn't know that it is easier to lead the right people than it is to lead the wrong people. Despite th...

Stop Slumps Before They Occur

Any real estate agency leader can tell when a salesperson is in a slump, but according to real estate agency profit consultant, Gary Pittard, the re...

Visual Aids

An age-old question for presenters is, "Should I use visual aids?". While I agree that people can become overly reliant on visual aids...

High But Not Out Of Sight

Goal setting needs to be done properly if it is going to work. Statistics show that only five percent of people set goals. Those five percent earn m...

Getting the Team to Focus

One of the top three complaints from agency leaders is that they cannot get their teams to focus on actions that produce results. Some have been compl...

Want to reach your profit potential? Contact us now.

Pittard


Suite 71, Level 4
330 Wattle Street

Ultimo NSW 2007
Australia


Mailing Address
PO Box 2045
Strawberry Hills NSW 2012


: (02) 8217 8500
Fax: (02) 9281 4198
AUS Free call: 1800 663 600
NZ Free call: 0800 448 065
International: +61 2 8217 8500

: info@pittard.com.au

Contact Us